My favorite period in all the literary genres in all countries! Once Emmanuel Kant asked " What is this?" Let me explain ...
There was a time of scientific experiments some of them were
offered as fascinating shows to the public in the mid-eighteenth century. Namely,
scientists did all they could to make people understand and visualize the
notion called – knowledge, by means of the demonstration of an orrery, a mechanical
model of the solar system that was used to demonstrate the motions of the
planets around the sun—making the universe seem almost like a clock.
Dutch and Flemish poems emerged, as follows
Boiology
If only Miss Beekman, you were a
single cell
Then love yould not matter much to
You
Then you could simply divine in
two
I admit: You would not like it as
well
But more practical it certainly is
A single cell is not in need of
another
But multiplies without any bother
Which books call parthenogenesis
But You with your cells, fourteen
billion in all
Sir forlorn in the lunch room, and
wait and wait
Miss Beekman, now it is well past
eight
He is not coming. Why did he not
call?
If only Miss Beekman, you were a
single cell.
Anna
Bijns
In the
center of the orrery is a gas light, which represents the sun (though the
figure who stands in the foreground with his back to us block this from our
view); the arcs represent the orbits of the planets.
It was
also a breakthrough of the Industrial Revolution (think cities, railroads,
steam power, gas and then electric light, factories, machines, pollution). The fascination with light, strange shadows, and darkness, reveals the influence of
Baroque art.
"Believe me," said he,
"our mistaken notions of things are so far from hiding our misfortunes
from our view, that they augment those evils by rendering trifles of
importance, and making us sensible of a thousand wants which we should never
have known but for our prejudices. Peace of mind consists in a contempt for everything
that may disturb it. The man who gives himself the greatest concern about life
is he who enjoys it least; and he who aspires the most earnestly after
happiness is always the one who is the most miserable."
"Alas!" cried I, with all the
bitterness of discontent, "what a deplorable picture do you present of
human life! If we may indulge ourselves in nothing, to what purpose were we
born? If we must despise even happiness itself, who is there that can know what
it is to be happy?"
"I know," replied the good
priest, in a tone and manner that struck me.
"You!" said I, "so little
favored by fortune! so poor! exiled! persecuted! can you be happy? And if you
are, what have you done to purchase happiness?"
"My dear child," he replied,
embracing me, "I will willingly tell you. As you have freely confessed to
me, I will do the same to you. I will disclose to you all the sentiments of my
heart. You shall see me, if not such as I really am, at least such as I believe
myself to be: and when you have heard my whole Profession of Faith-when you
know fully the situation of my heart-you will know why I think myself happy;
and, if you agree with me, what course you should pursue in order to become so
likewise.
"But this profession is not to be
made in a moment. It will require some time to disclose to you my thoughts on
the situation of mankind and on the real value of human life. We will therefore
take a suitable opportunity for a few hours' uninterrupted conversation on this
subject." Jean Jacques Rousseau: Profession of Faith of a Savoyard Vicar, 1782
Toward
the middle of the eighteenth century a shift in thinking occurred. This shift
is known as the Enlightenment. You have probably already heard of some important
Enlightenment figures, like Rousseau, Diderot and Voltaire. It is helpful I
think to think about the word "enlighten" here—the idea of shedding
light on something, illuminating it, making it clear.
The
thinkers of the Enlightenment, influenced by the scientific revolutions of the
previous century, believed in shedding the light of science and reason on the
world, and in order to question traditional ideas and ways of doing things. The
scientific revolution (based on empirical observation, and not on metaphysics
or spirituality) gave the impression that the universe behaved according to
universal and unchanging laws (think of Newton
here). This provided a model for looking rationally on human institutions as
well as nature.
Rousseau,
for example, began to question the idea of the divine right of Kings. In The
Social Contract, he wrote that the
King does not, in fact, receive his power from God, but rather from the general
will of the people. This, of course, implies that "the people" can
also take away that power! The Enlightenment thinkers also discussed other
ideas that are the founding principles of any democracy—the idea of the
importance of the individual who can reason for himself, the idea of equality
under the law, and the idea of natural rights. The Enlightenment was a period
of profound optimism, a sense that with science and reason—and the consequent
shedding of old superstitions—human beings and human society would improve.
You
can probably tell already that the Enlightenment was anti-clerical; it was, for
the most part, opposed to traditional Catholicism. Instead, the Enlightenment
thinkers developed a way of understanding the universe called Deism—the idea,
more or less, is that there is a God, but that this God is not the figure of
the Old and New Testaments, actively involved in human affairs.
The
Enlightenment encouraged criticism of the corruption of the monarchy (at this
point King Louis XVI), and the aristocracy. Enloghtenment thinkers condemned
Rococo art for being immoral and indecent, and called for a new kind of art
that would be moral instead of immoral, and teach people right and wrong.
Denis Diderot, Enlightenment
philosopher, writer and art critic, wrote that the aim of art was "to make
virtue attractive, vice odious, ridicule forceful; that is the aim of every
honest man who takes up the pen, the brush or the chisel' (Essai sur la
peinture).
These
new ways of thinking, combined with a financial crisis (the country was
literally bankrupt) and poor harvests left many ordinary French people both
angry and hungry. In 1789, the French Revolution began. In its first stage, all
the revolutionaries ask for is a constitution that would limit the power of the
king.
Ultimately the idea of a
constitution failed, and the revolution entered a more radical stage. In 1792,
Louis XVI and his wife Marie Antoinette, were beheaded along with thousands of
other aristocrats believed to be loyal to the monarchy.
Komentarze
Prześlij komentarz